The United States Constitution and the Free Press: A Bastion Undermined by Bias
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution stands as a cornerstone of American liberty, boldly declaring: “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.” This protection was not an afterthought but a deliberate safeguard, rooted in the founders’ belief that a free press is essential to a self-governing republic. It was intended to ensure that citizens have access to information, unfiltered by government control, to make informed decisions and hold power accountable. Yet, in 2025, the noble ideal of a free press is under siege, not by legal suppression, but by the mainstream media’s abandonment of fair, unbiased reporting. This betrayal has eroded trust, deepened division, and, in some cases, cost lives.
POLITICS
Rick Ryan
4/8/20254 min read
The Constitutional Promise
The framers of the Constitution understood the press as a “fourth estate,” a watchdog against tyranny and corruption. James Madison, a key architect of the Bill of Rights, argued that “a popular government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy.” The First Amendment’s protection of the press was not merely a privilege for journalists but a duty: to inform the public with truth, not to shape March 2025 Free, Unbiased Press narratives for profit or ideology. This freedom comes with an implicit expectation of integrity, a press that pursues facts over agendas. For much of American history, the press largely upheld this role, even if imperfectly. From exposing the Watergate scandal to uncovering government overreach, journalists earned their reputation as guardians of democracy. But today, that legacy is fraying
The Shift to Bias and Sensationalism
In recent decades, the mainstream media, spanning television networks like CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, NBC, CBS and ABC as well as print and digital outlets, has increasingly traded objectivity for sensationalism and partisanship. The 24-hour news cycle, driven by ratings and clicks, prioritizes outrage over accuracy. Corporate ownership consolidates editorial control, aligning coverage with the interests of a handful of conglomerates. Political leanings, once subtle, now dominate headlines, with outlets openly catering to specific ideological audiences
Data backs this shift. A 2024 study by the American Press Institute found that 68% of Americans believe the media is more biased than it was a decade ago, with trust in news outlets plummeting to historic lows. The coverage of polarizing issues, elections, public health, or social justice often amplifies one side while dismissing the other, cherry-picking facts to fit preordained conclusions. The result is a fractured information landscape where “truth” depends on which channel you tune into.


The Damage Done..
This departure from unbiased reporting has tangible consequences. Public discourse suffers as Americans retreat into echo chambers, unable to agree on basic facts. Political polarization deepens, with media outlets fanning the flames of distrust. A 2023 Pew Research survey found that 79% of Americans blame the media for exacerbating national divisions, a direct threat to the unity the Constitution seeks to preserve


Worse still, biased reporting can cost lives. Consider the COVID-19 pandemic, thus is where the agendas of inconsistency really exposed themselves to the public that had only the media to get answers: early on, some outlets downplayed the virus’s severity to avoid panic or align with political narratives, while others exaggerated risks, sowing confusion. Misinformation about treatments, amplified by sensational headlines, led desperate individuals to pursue unproven remedies, sometimes with fatal results. From my own experience of being an essential worker, I continued to work until catching the first strain of Covid-19 and it hit hard. I was obviously concerned and needed answers, medical staff had nothing, instead made me feel like an experiment. I ignored all these gossip media networks and did my own research and followed studies by John Hopkins University as well as many others. In 2021, the Kaiser Family Foundation estimated that vaccine hesitancy, fueled in part by conflicting media narratives, contributed to thousands of preventable deaths. Another stark example is the coverage of civil unrest. During the 2020 protests following George Floyd’s death, some networks framed events as uniformly peaceful, while others painted them as unrelenting chaos. Both distortions obscured the truth, inflaming tensions and, in some cases, inciting violence. A 2022 analysis by the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project linked sensationalized reporting to spikes in localized clashes, with dozens of injuries and deaths tied to misinformation about specific incidents.
The Cost in Lives and Trust
The human toll of a biased press extends beyond statistics. Families lose loved ones to decisions based on skewed reporting, whether it’s rejecting a vaccine or joining a volatile protest, wars happen, peace talks fail. Communities fracture as neighbors consume irreconcilable versions of reality. And democracy itself weakens when citizens no longer trust the information, they need to govern themselves. The Constitution’s promise of a free press becomes hollow if that press prioritizes agenda over accuracy.
Reclaiming the Ideal

